Plugin
One command. Sixty seconds.
npx @flowforge/core init installs 29 specialist AI agents, 35 quality rules enforced via git hooks, session persistence across conversations, and automatic time tracking.
MIT researchers proved every AI coding agent degrades code over time. Zero exceptions. FlowForge is the tooling-level fix — 29 specialist agents, automated quality gates, and session persistence that turns chaotic AI development into production-grade software.
AI coding tools are fast. They're also reckless. Without guardrails, they produce god functions with cyclomatic complexity of 285, duplicate code at 2.2× human rates, and break their own prior work on 99.5% of iterative tasks. One developer using FlowForge built a medical AI platform with over 1.2 million lines of code across 14 domains in 4 months — work that would take a team of 6 over two years. The difference wasn't the AI. It was the system around it.
SlopCodeBench (UW-Madison, WSU, MIT) tested 11 frontier AI models across 93 iterative checkpoints. The results should worry every engineering leader.
| Checkpoint # | Human code erosion | Agent code erosion |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.31 | 0.40 |
| 2 | 0.31 | 0.46 |
| 3 | 0.31 | 0.51 |
| 4 | 0.31 | 0.57 |
| 5 | 0.31 | 0.63 |
| 6 (93) | 0.31 | 0.68 |
Agent code erodes. Human code doesn't.
2.2× more redundant code.
| Prompt style | Start intercept | Slope |
|---|---|---|
| Default prompt | 0.40 | Same |
| Quality prompt (+47.9% cost) | 0.30 | Same |
Better prompts shift the start. Not the slope.
Zero full solutions. Not a single AI agent completed a full iterative coding task without degrading the codebase. The models tested included GPT-4o, Claude 3.7 Sonnet, Gemini 2.0 Flash, and 8 others. All failed.
80% of trajectories show structural erosion. As AI agents iterate — fixing bugs, adding features, responding to follow-up prompts — the maintainability index deteriorates consistently. More checkpoints means worse code, guaranteed.
89.8% of trajectories show growing verbosity. Agents duplicate logic, over-comment, pad functions, and accumulate dead code at 2.2× the rate of human developers. Your codebase silently inflates with every session.
Prompt engineering does not fix this. More detailed instructions improve starting quality, but the degradation rate remains identical. This is a structural property of AI-driven iteration — not a prompting problem.
More money does not help either. Mean cost per checkpoint grows 2.9× ($1.46 to $4.17) with zero quality improvement. Spending more on larger models or longer prompts accelerates cost while the erosion trajectory stays identical.
"Prompt pressure shifts the starting point but not the rate."
FlowForge wraps AI development in quality guardrails at every level — from solo developer to enterprise team.
One command. Sixty seconds.
npx @flowforge/core init installs 29 specialist AI agents, 35 quality rules enforced via git hooks, session persistence across conversations, and automatic time tracking.
Mission control for AI development.
A terminal UI that spawns multiple Claude Code workers in parallel, shows real-time context usage per terminal, manages a micro-task queue, and lets you merge PRs with a single keystroke.
Intelligence for managers who don't write code.
A PRD creation wizard that turns plain-language feature descriptions into structured specs with tickets and estimates — giving your whole team a shared source of truth.
Layer 1 — Free
One command installs 29 specialist AI agents, 35 quality rules enforced via git hooks, session persistence across conversations, and automatic time tracking. No config files. No learning curve.
Layer 2 — $29/mo
A terminal UI that spawns multiple Claude Code workers in parallel, shows real-time context usage, manages a micro-task queue, and lets you merge PRs with a single keystroke.
Layer 3 — $79/mo
A web dashboard that turns plain-language feature descriptions into structured PRDs with tickets and estimates — giving your entire team a shared source of truth.
DELPHOS is a healthcare intelligence platform running 5 AI models on-premise, serving real clinical workflows. It was built by one developer with FlowForge and Claude Code.
lines of code
AI models
test coverage
quality seal
tool bridges
quality rules
domains
to build
Traditional software teams need a frontend specialist, backend engineer, database architect, DevOps engineer, QA engineer, and a tech lead just to ship a feature. Coordination alone consumes 30–40% of engineering capacity before a single line of production code is written.
FlowForge replaces the coordination layer with automated quality gates and specialist AI agents — each with a focused domain, enforced rules, and a handoff protocol that preserves context across every session. The result is verifiable: over 1.2 million lines of code, 5 running AI models, 80%+ test coverage, and a 97/100% documentation-implementation quality seal earned through a structured gap-analysis process.
Your AI doesn't need more training. It needs a system.
$ npx flowforge session:start #142
[FF] Timer started: 00:00:00
[FF] Branch: feature/142-command-consolidation
[FF] Context loaded: 3 handoff items
[FF] Agent: fft-backend (auto-selected)
[FF] Task: Consolidate session commands (est. 20 min)
[FF] Ready. Tests first.
Every significant decision in a FlowForge session follows the same pattern: the orchestrating agent presents three implementation options with trade-offs, waits for developer approval, and only then delegates to the appropriate specialist. No code is written without a human decision point — which means no surprise architectural debt, no undocumented shortcuts, and no "I'll fix it later."
Instead of one AI doing everything badly, FlowForge routes each task to a domain specialist.
System design, 3-option analysis
Sprint planning, micro-tasks
API contracts, OpenAPI specs
Requirements, acceptance criteria
Node.js, Python, Go
React, Vue, Angular
PostgreSQL, schema design
Swift, SwiftUI, UIKit native iOS development
Kotlin, Jetpack Compose native Android development
Dart, Riverpod cross-platform development
TDD, coverage, E2E
Erosion, verbosity, security
OWASP, threat modeling
Load testing, optimization
Full-stack quality assurance
Docker, CI/CD, IaC
API docs, ADRs
Branch management, PRs
UI/UX, design tokens
Brand identity, color theory, design tokens
Brazilian Portuguese documentation
Landing page copy, SEO, conversion
Multi-platform social content and analytics
Strategy, model selection
Local models, quantization
Retrieval, embeddings
CrewAI, LangChain
Healthcare, HIPAA
Creates new specialist agents
FlowForge's Team Dashboard turns developer activity into business intelligence.
Describe a feature in plain English. FlowForge generates a full PRD, user stories, and micro-tasks — ready to sprint.
Replace abstract story points with deterministic 10–30 minute tasks. Velocity becomes a real number, not a negotiation.
Git hooks capture start and end of every task. Billable hours are calculated automatically — no manual timesheets.
Billable hours calculated automatically
Every Monday, stakeholders receive an auto-generated PDF with velocity trends, burndown, and time-per-feature breakdown.
SlopCodeBench is the first large-scale benchmark of how AI coding agents degrade code over iterative development.
| SlopCodeBench Finding | Impact | FlowForge Solution |
|---|---|---|
| 0% end-to-end solve rate | No AI can maintain a codebase alone | 29 specialist agents |
| 80% structural erosion | God functions, cyclomatic complexity = 285 | CC gates at CC > 10 via hooks |
| 89.8% growing verbosity | 2.2× human code volume | AST duplication detection |
| Prompt engineering same slope +47.9% cost | Better prompts don't prevent degradation | Tooling level, not prompt level |
| Regression failures 0.5%/iter | New features break existing behaviour | TDD enforcement, 80%+ coverage |
| Cost grows 2.9× | More spending, no quality improvement | Architecture-first, micro-tasks |
| Checkpoint | Without FlowForge (quality score) | With FlowForge (quality score) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.40 | 0.38 |
| 2 | 0.48 | 0.35 |
| 3 | 0.55 | 0.37 |
| 4 | 0.62 | 0.34 |
| 5 | 0.67 | 0.36 |
| 6 | 0.72 | 0.33 |
| 7 | 0.76 | 0.35 |
| 8 | 0.79 | 0.32 |
| 9 | 0.81 | 0.34 |
| 10 | 0.82 | 0.30 |
Reference: Orlanski, G., Roy, D., et al. (2026). SlopCodeBench: Benchmarking How Coding Agents Degrade Over Long-Horizon Iterative Tasks. arXiv:2603.24755.
ForgePlay orchestrates your entire specialist agent team automatically — from blank canvas to production-ready output, in a single command.
Most development bottlenecks aren't technical. They're coordination. Thirteen back-and-forth threads to align a designer, a backend engineer, a security reviewer, and a tester on a single feature.
ForgePlay eliminates the coordination layer entirely. Pick a play. Describe your goal. Watch 6 specialist agents work in parallel while you focus on what actually matters.
Tell ForgePlay your product name and vision in plain language. It handles everything else.
Agent pipeline: Brand Architect and Content Strategist run in parallel with Designer, then outputs converge into Frontend Engineer, then Quality and Performance, then Code Reviewer.
Result: A production-ready landing page. One play. 6 specialists. Zero context switching.
What used to take 3 weeks of stakeholder alignment now ships in a single session.
Point ForgePlay at your existing codebase. It designs the payment flow, implements the backend logic, builds the checkout UI, locks down PCI compliance, and writes the tests — all in one coordinated run. No payment consultants. No security reviews that take two weeks. No "we'll add tests later."
Result: Working Stripe integration — subscriptions, webhooks, failed-charge recovery. Tested. Secure. Merged.
Right now, a non-technical idea has to travel through a chain of translators before it becomes a ticket a developer can act on.
The marketing lead describes the feature. The PM writes a brief. The tech lead translates it into requirements. The architect turns those into tasks. The project manager estimates effort. By the time the developer opens the ticket, the original intent is three conversations removed.
ForgePlay cuts the chain to one step.
A CEO, a department head, an operations manager — anyone on your team can open the ForgePlay chat, describe what they need in natural language, and walk away with a fully structured sprint: PRD, architecture decision, timeline, milestones, every ticket written.
No technical translator required. No three-meeting process. No "let me loop in the CTO first."
Result: A complete sprint your dev team can execute on day one. Time estimate. Cost projection. Every ticket written. Nothing lost in translation.
The HR manager who needs a compliance feature can now prepare the full sprint herself and send it directly to the CTO for approval. No meetings. No miscommunication. No wasted cycles.
No credit card required · Setup in 4 minutes · Cancel anytime
The FlowForge Dashboard gives engineering leaders complete visibility — not summaries, not estimates, not status-update theatre. The actual numbers. In real time.
| Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 65% | 80% | 55% | 90% | 72% |
Every metric your team generates — tasks completed per day, PR cycle time, code quality scores, sprint velocity — visible in one place, updated in real time.
No end-of-week report that's already three days old. No stand-up where you discover a blocked ticket that's been sitting since Tuesday.
Individual daily output, trended over the last 30 days.
Average hours from open to merged. Per developer and team-wide.
Composite from code review findings, test coverage, and complexity metrics. Tracked over sprints.
Automatic session logging tied to tickets. One-click PDF billing reports for clients.
Your Monday morning 30-minute sync becomes a 5-minute glance.
FlowForge monitors how each developer works — what they build, where code review finds issues, where tickets stall, where coverage drops. Then it tells you exactly what each person needs to improve.
Not a generic training catalog. An individual development plan, generated from actual work patterns.
Strong on backend architecture. Frontend testing coverage consistently below team average. Recommended: 3 targeted exercises, 2 documentation references, 1 practice ticket pre-loaded in the backlog.
Fast delivery velocity — top quartile on tasks per day. Code review findings run 3× higher than team average, concentrated in error handling and edge cases. Recommended: Error-handling deep-dive module, curated examples from merged PRs, weekly review pairing.
Every knowledge gap identified. Every training plan written. Your team gets stronger every sprint — without a learning management system, a training budget, or a dedicated session.
Non-technical leaders have always been one report away from understanding what the team is actually building. That report arrives on Friday. The problem it describes happened on Wednesday.
The FlowForge CTO View updates continuously. Sprint progress, budget burn rate against delivery, risk flags, active ForgePlay workflows — everything visible, everything actionable.
Ticket completion percentage, open vs closed, days remaining. One glance to know if the sprint is on track.
Actual hours logged against projected estimate. Cost variance flagged before it becomes a problem.
Blocked tickets older than 24 hours. PRs open longer than team average. Test coverage trending down. Flags surface automatically — no one has to notice.
Active plays, completed plays, plays awaiting approval. Approve a plan without opening a Slack thread.
You stop asking "where are we?" because the answer is always one tab away.
Weekly summaries to Slack. Monthly PDF reports for stakeholders. Velocity and burndown charts generated without a data analyst. Individual contribution exports for performance reviews.
And when your team already lives inside Notion, Linear, or Jira — FlowForge pushes to all of them.
Works with your existing tools. No migration required.
Every plan includes the Plugin. Upgrade for mission control and team intelligence.
FlowForge doesn't just claim quality. Every metric below comes from a production multi-domain system built exclusively with FlowForge-managed AI sessions.
I stopped worrying about whether the AI would produce garbage. The hooks catch it.
Context persistence changed everything. I used to spend 30 minutes every morning re-explaining.
The micro-task system killed our estimation meetings.
| Metric | Before | After FlowForge |
|---|---|---|
| Context re-explanation | 20–30 min per session | 0 min |
| Tests per feature | Optional | Mandatory 80%+ |
| Commits to main | Frequent | Never (branch + PR) |
| Estimation accuracy | ±40% | ±15% |
| Code review | Sometimes | Always (auto + human) |
| Time tracking | Self-reported | Automatic |
No configuration wizard. No onboarding tutorial. One command, and your AI has guardrails.
$ npx @flowforge/core init Installing FlowForge... ✓ Created .flowforge/ ✓ Installed 8 specialist agents ✓ Registered 15 git hooks ✓ Ready in 4.2s
$ flowforge session:start feature/142-command-consolidation Session sess_1745000000000_a1b2c3d4 started on branch "feature/142-command-consolidation".
[PASS] Branch protection — feature/142-command-consolidation [PASS] Test coverage — 84.2% (threshold: 80%) [PASS] File size — 342 lines (limit: 700) [PASS] Complexity — CC=6 (threshold: 10) [PASS] JSDoc coverage — 100% exports documented [FAIL] Console statements — Found console.log at line 47
$ flowforge session:end Session completed (2h 15m). 8 commit(s), 12 file(s) changed.
[PASS] Branch protection No direct main commits [PASS] Test coverage 80%+ threshold enforced [PASS] File size limit 700 lines max per file [PASS] No console.log Production code clean [PASS] Commit format Ticket reference required [PASS] JSDoc coverage Exports documented [PASS] Complexity threshold CC < 10 enforced [PASS] No TODO comments Production code clean [PASS] No debug statements breakpoint/debugger blocked [PASS] Mandatory TDD Test before implementation [PASS] PR review required Auto + human approval [PASS] Conventional commits Semantic messages [PASS] Changelog updated On feature merges [PASS] Dependencies pinned Exact versions [PASS] Security scan npm audit + dependabot
fft-architecture fft-backend fft-frontend fft-testing fft-code-reviewer fft-database fft-documentation fft-project-manager +--[ FlowForge Controller ]------+ | [*] W1 #142 02:12 [CTX: 34%] | | [ ] W2 #143 00:22 [CTX: 67%]! | | [ ] W3 #89 01:45 [CTX: 12%] | | Merge: PR #892 [Ready] | +--------------------------------+
Run 7+ parallel Claude Code workers. Monitor context usage. Merge PRs without leaving the terminal.
MIT proved the problem. DELPHOS proved the solution. Your turn.
FlowForge is free to start and takes 60 seconds to install. Eight specialist agents. Fifteen quality gates. Session persistence. Time tracking. All enforced automatically.
npx @flowforge/core init